St. John v. Wisconsin Employment Relations Board
District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
1Opinion of the Court
DUFFY, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiffs bring this action individually and as officers of Local 18, United Gas, Coke and Chemical Workers (CIO) (hereinafter called the “union”), upon behalf of all the union members'who are employees of the corporate defendent. Plaintiffs seek a permanent injunction enjoining and restraining the enforcement of. subchapter 3 of Chap. Ill,-Wis.Stats. of 1947,1 sometimes referred to as the Public Utility Anti-Strike Law.2 They also seek a declaratory judgment that, said subchapter of the statutes is invalid. Defendants Gooding, Fitzgibbons and Rule are the individual…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Angel v. BullingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Heiser v. WoodruffSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Treinies v. Sunshine Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Davis v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Grubb v. Public Util. Comm'n of OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Rosenthal v. State of Nev.District Court, D. Nevada · 1981
- St. John v. Wisconsin Employment Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Larsen v. THE M/V TEALDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1961