Legal Opinion

Dunn v. Eickhoff

New York Court of Appeals

Decided October 8, 1974PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Memobandum. The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, without costs, on the majority opinion at the Appellate Division, with the following added comments: The disbarment of a lawyer creates no “ nullities ”, the person involved simply loses all license to practice law, that is, to hold himself out as a lawyer or to receive compensation for legal services. As for the infant plaintiff, he is generally bound, with obvious limitations, by those who act in his behalf for better or for worse, but mostly for his benefit (Matter of Hawley, 100 N. Y. 206, 211). Otherwise, as a practical…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In Re the Accountings of HawleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1885

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. People v. FelderNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
  2. Cuevas v. CuevasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  3. Elm Management Corp. v. SprungAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  4. In re the Estate of LackasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
  5. People v. PizzaroNew York Supreme Court · 1990

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API