Legal Opinion

Zinner v. Louis Meyers & Son, Inc.

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 17, 1943PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdeb, J.

Motion of defendant to vacate notice heretofore served by plaintiffs for discovery and inspection, sought by virtue of section 327 of the Civil Practice Act, is granted. That statute is applicable only where a document is referred to in an adversary’s “ pleadings of affidavits ”, and it is clear that where such is not the case, discovery and inspection must be sought by motion and order of the court obtained therefor. (Schmoll Fils Associated v. Baltic America Line, 231 App. Div. 231.) Admittedly, there is no reference to any document. in the defendant’s pleading or in any affidavit by it;…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Schmoll Fils Associated, Inc. v. Baltic America Line, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1931

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. RodriquezCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1978
  2. Dache v. Abraham & Straus, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API