Legal Opinion

Center for Biological Diversity

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided January 6, 2005No. 02-16201Published

1Opinion of the Court

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY,  a nonprofit corporation; CENTRAL AZ PADDLERS CLUB, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. No. 02-16201 ANN M. VENEMAN, Secretary of the D.C. No. United States Department of  CV 01-00477 WDB Agriculture; DALE BOSWORTH, ORDER AND Chief of United States Forest AMENDED Service; ELEANOR TOWNS, Regional OPINION Forester, United States Forest Service, Region Three; UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, Defendants-Appellees.  Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona William D.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Lujan v. National Wildlife FederationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Norton v. Southern Utah Wilderness AllianceSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Semtek International Inc. v. Lockheed Martin Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
  4. Thinket Ink Information Resources, Inc. v. Sun Microsystems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  5. Vernon Vu Luong v. Circuit City Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API