Rice v. City of Chicago
Appellate Court of Illinois
Memorandum.—Assumpsit. In the Circuit Court of Cook County; the Hon. Frank Baker, Judge, presiding. Common counts; money due for compensation for property taken for public use; plea of nonassumpsit; trial by the court; finding and judgment for defendant; error by plaintiff. Heard in this court at the October term, 1894, and affirmed.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Shepard
At the time the condemnation proceedings were instituted by the village of Hyde Park for the opening of Forrestville avenue (now Langley avenue), from 41st street to 47th street, the appellant, William II. Rice, was the owner of certain premises fronting south on 42d street, of which the east thirteen and three-tenths feet were proposed to be taken for the projected improvement, and he continued to be such owner ivhen, on December 29, 1873, judgment in such proceedings was had, and the sum of $970.90 was awarded to the owner or owners of said thirteen and three-tenths feet.
Subsequent…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co. v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1893
- City of Chicago v. BarbianIllinois Supreme Court · 1875
- Rees v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1865
- City of Chicago v. ShepardAppellate Court of Illinois · 1881
3Cited by5 opinions
- Chandler v. MoreyIllinois Supreme Court · 1902
- Price v. EngelkingAppellate Court of Illinois · 1895
- Wadelski v. Sixteenth Ward Building & Loan Ass'nAppellate Court of Illinois · 1934
- D.R.G., Inc. v. GoodhartAppellate Court of Illinois · 1978
- City of Evanston v. O'LearyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1897