Legal Opinion

Swift v. Meyers

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Oregon

Decided December 24, 1888PublishedCited by 8 opinions

At Law. Action to recover possession of real property.

1Opinion of the CourtDeady, J.

This action is brought by the plaintiff, a citizen of California, against the defendants, citizens of Oregon, to recover 377.77 acres of land situate in Linn county, Or., exceeding in value $6,000.

The case was tried by the court, without the intervention of a jury, upon the amended complaint, answer, and reply thereto, and a stipulation as to the facts.

From these it appears that on and prior to October 16, 1879, Philip Grigsby was the owner of the premises in question, subject to a mortgage thereon, given to the state commissioners for the management of the school fund, to secure the payment…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Thompson v. WhitmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  2. Galpin v. PageSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  3. Elliott v. Lessee of PeirsolSupreme Court of the United States · 1828
  4. Christmas v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1866
  5. D'Arcy v. KetchumSupreme Court of the United States · 1851

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Berryhill v. SeppSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1909
  2. Phœnix Bridge Co. v. CastleberryCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1904
  3. By-Products Recovery Co. v. MabeeDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1923
  4. Hartley v. Rice Et Ux.Oregon Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Brignall v. MerkleAppellate Court of Illinois · 1940

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API