Fava v. Rasweiler

There is no proof whatever that defendant Lloyd Carl Rasweiler, a co-owner with defendant Carl Rasweiler of one of the parcels involved in the proposed sale, employed plaintiffs, authorized their employment, or ratified their employment. (Barrett v. Lang, 243 App. Div. 35, affd. 269 N. Y. 511; Judis v. V. B. Holding Corp., 246 App. Div. 273, affd. 272 N. Y. 483.) There was proof, however, that plaintiffs were employed by defendant Carl Rasweiler, that such employment was authorized or ratified by defendant George P. Rasweiler, and that plaintiffs produced a buyer ready, able and willing to…