Legal Opinion

Harris v. City of Little Rock

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided March 8, 2001No. 99-1316Published

1Opinion of the Court

40 S.W.3d 214 (2001)

344 Ark. 95

Nora HARRIS

v.

CITY OF LITTLE ROCK.

No. 99-1316.

Supreme Court of Arkansas.

March 8, 2001.

David P. Henry, Little Rock, for appellant.

Thomas M. Carpenter, Little Rock, for appellee.

CORBIN, Justice.

This is a suit brought by a taxpayer, Appellant Nora Harris, against Appellee City of Little Rock, challenging the city's issuance of revenue bonds that will, in part, finance the acquisition of land for the William Jefferson Clinton Presidential Park. On March 17, 1998, the city, through its board of directors, passed Ordinance No. 17,690, authorizing the city to issue and…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Glaze; Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Glaze; Concurrence · Brown; Concurrence · Imber.

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Stephens v. Arkansas School for the BlindSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
  2. Craft v. City of Fort SmithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  3. Daniel v. JonesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  4. Harris v. City of Little RockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
  5. Foster v. Jefferson County Quorum CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API