Legal Opinion
People v. Whitley
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 1, 2009PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*791The People failed to preserve for appellate review their contention that a separate speedy trial period should have been applied to each of three accusatory instruments filed against the defendant, including the indictment that is the subject of the instant appeal (see CPL 470.05 [2]), and we decline to reach the argument in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction (see CPL 470.15 [3] [c]). Since, accordingly, we must measure the six-month speedy trial period from the filing of indictment No. 3930/06 on May 20, 2006, the six-month period referable to this case, measured from May…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- People v. WorleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- People v. BrownAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- People v. ManningAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- People v. GonzalezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- People v. AllenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- PALLAGI, SASHALEE, PEOPLE vAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- People v. BarnesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2018
- People v. CaroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2023