Legal Opinion · Dissent

In re Clarification of an Appropriate Unit

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided November 19, 1996No. C3-96-699Published

1DissentLansing, Judge

I agree with the majority’s statement that the Public Employment Labor Relations Act does not expressly prohibit a confidential supervisory employee from being included in the same bargaining unit with noneonfiden-tial supervisory employees. But I think that is where the analysis begins, not where it ends.

A confidential employee is defined by statute as an employee who has access to information used by the public employer in negotiating or actively participates in negotiations on behalf of the employer. Minn.Stat. § 179A03, subd. 4(1), (2) (1994). Supervisory employees include all employees…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. School Service Employees Local No. 284 v. Independent School District No. 270Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API