Legal Opinion

Territory of Hawaii v. Kinoshita

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided April 20, 1949No. 2642PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

CRISTY, J.

This is a writ of error to review a judgment of conviction of the crime of indecent assault.

Section 11666, Revised Laws of Hawaii 1945, defines the crime as follows: “Whoever takes indecent and improper liberties with the person of a female child under the age of twelve years without committing or intending to commit the crime of rape shall be deemed guilty of indecent assault and on conviction thereof shall be punished by a fine not exceeding one thousand dollars or imprisonment at hard labor for not more than five years or both.”

The plaintiff in error,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. St. Clair v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. Williams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1943
  3. Eastlick v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1902
  4. Soto v. Territory of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Republic of Hawaii v. NenchiroHawaii Supreme Court · 1899

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State v. MooreHawaii Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Lancaster v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1980
  3. State v. CummingsHawaii Supreme Court · 1967
  4. State v. BoodryArizona Supreme Court · 1964
  5. State v. FosterHawaii Supreme Court · 1960

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API