Legal Opinion

The Arrogante Barcelones

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 19, 1822PublishedCited by 76 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Maryland.. This was a libel filed by the Consul Genera! of his Catholic- Majesty, in the District Court of Maryland, against the Spanish ship Arrogante .Barcelonés, and cargo, praying restitution to the original Spanish owners, upon the ground of the same having been captured on the high seas, in violation of the laws, treaties, and neutral obligations of the United States, §nd brought within their territorial jurisdiction.

Read the full summary

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Maryland.. This was a libel filed by the Consul Genera! of his Catholic- Majesty, in the District Court of Maryland, against the Spanish ship Arrogante .Barcelonés, and cargo, praying restitution to the original Spanish owners, upon the ground of the same having been captured on the high seas, in violation of the laws, treaties, and neutral obligations of the United States, §nd brought within their territorial jurisdiction. A claim was filed by Joseph Almeida, who insisted uppn his title as a bona fide purchaser, under a' capture made by the . Buenos Ayres…

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Johnson

The offence proved upon Almeida in this case is one of a very aggravated nature. He not only violated the neutrality of this government, but «nected his purpose, by practising a flagrant fraud, either upon his crew, or upon the revenue officers of the port of Baltimore ; or perhaps partially upon both. Every thing in the case proves that the sealing voyage round Cape Horn was a mere pretext; and if it be true that the crew were kidnapped under that pretext, and forced into belligerent service after getting to sea, it is a remarkable instance of bold and successful imposition. But who can…

2Cited by76 opinions

  1. Glus v. Brooklyn Eastern District TerminalSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  2. The Fanny. The Consul-General of Portugal, LibellantSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
  3. Stewart v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1864
  4. The AppamDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1916
  5. (PC) Arevalo v. PalaciosDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2022

71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API