Legal Opinion

Cunningham v. McConnell

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 4, 1963No. 40060PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BERRY, Justice.

This action, originally brought by A. F. Bradfield, now deceased, revived prior to trial in his Executrix, Emma Bradfield, and later revived again in Emma Bradfield’s Executor, proceeded to trial on the amended petition of Emma Bradfield, herein referred to as plaintiff, to enjoin J. W. McConnell, Jr., herein referred to as defendant, from interfering with the natural flow of surface waters in such a way as to injure plaintiff. Defendant filed cross-petition which is not involved on this appeal.

For the sake of brevity, we will only consider the pleadings and proceedings which…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Culbertson v. GreeneSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
  2. Gregory v. BogdanoffSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1957
  3. Rainey v. ClevelandSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lynn v. RaineySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965
  2. Leathers v. Commercial National Bank in MuskogeeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API