Legal Opinion

Hogren v. Schlueter

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided October 9, 1984No. CX-84-516PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LESLIE, Judge.

Plaintiff-appellant and defendant-respondent both brought suit by claim and counterclaim, each seeking compensatory and punitive damages. The jury found for each but awarded only punitive damages to the appellant and only compensatory damages to respondent. The court subsequently set-off the punitive damages against the compensatory damages and ordered judgment for the defendant for the difference. Appellant objects to the order setting off the punitive damages against the compensatory damages.

We affirm.

FACTS

Appellant Hogren sued respondent Schlueter for assault. She…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Ventoza v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1976
  2. Barnes v. VerrySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
  3. Margott v. Gem Properties, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1973
  4. Lundberg v. DavidsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1897
  5. Rose v. Galbraith Motor Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1957

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Junak v. JohnCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
  2. Stoebner v. PNY Technologies, Inc. (In re Polaroid Corp. )United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 2013
  3. Galioto Towing LLC v. The Huntington National BankDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API