Legal Opinion

Artus v. Alaska Department of Labor, Employment Security Division

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 15, 1983No. 82-3635PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FLETCHER, Circuit Judge:

This appeal is from the bankruptcy court’s ruling (affirmed by the district court) that the provisions of an Alaska statute requiring payment of creditors of a liquor establishment before transfer of a liquor license are preempted by federal bankruptcy law. We have jurisdiction under 11 U.S.C. § 47(a) (1976) (repealed 1978) and reverse.1

*1448I

On March 28, 1979, Anchorage International Inn, Inc. (Inn), the owner of an Alaska liquor license, was adjudicated a bankrupt. Prior to bankruptcy, the Inn had incurred two substantial debts arising out of the. operation of a tavern…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Perez. v. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Ziffrin, Inc. v. ReevesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  3. In The Matter Of Professional Bar Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
  4. In Re Petite Auberge Village, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
  5. Washington Brewers Institute v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1943

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re Anchorage International Inn, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
  2. United States v. Stone (In re Stone)Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
  3. California v. Farmers Markets, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API