Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Tiberi

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 29, 1976No. Appeal, 781PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Cercone, J.,

The instant appeal arises from appellant’s conviction, after a jury trial, of one count of extortion 1 and one count of “macing.” 2 Appellant also was charged with bribery 3 and tampering with witnesses, 4 but on those charges the jury found him not guilty. The extortion and macing charges arose from the same series of discussions between appellant, Mr. Tiberi, who was an area superintendent with the Pennsylvania Department of Transportation (PennDot), Jerome Hornyak, a local superintendent with PennDot, and Floyd Critchlow, a heavy equipment operator. The facts giving…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  3. Dombrowski v. PfisterSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. United Public Workers of America v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  5. United States Civil Service Commission v. National Ass'n of Letter CarriersSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. GuessSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  2. Commonwealth v. StaufferSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  3. State v. O'FlynnSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1985
  4. Cipparone v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1985
  5. Commonwealth v. CasperSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API