Legal Opinion

Calcutt v. Gaylord

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided May 20, 1953No. 32530PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice HershEy

On August 1, 1951, appellee, Hiram Calcutt, filed his complaint in the circuit court of Rock Island County praying that he be declared the legal and equitable owner of certain real estate, that said realty be impressed with a trust for his benefit and appellants be ordered to convey the premises to him, or that specific performance be decreed of an oral agreement alleged to have existed between him and George B. Gaylord, deceased, wherein Gaylord promised to convey the property to appellee and his wife providing they came to live with him, furnished meals and cared for him. An answer was…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hudson v. HudsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Alexander v. American Bible SocietyIllinois Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Arliskas v. ArliskasIllinois Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Fonda v. MillerIllinois Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Schnepper v. AshlockIllinois Supreme Court · 1949

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Village of San Jose, a Municipal Corporation v. Daniel L. McWilliams and Ida M. McWilliams Debtors-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
  2. Cole v. GuyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1989
  3. Michalski v. Chicago Title & Trust Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1977
  4. First Illinois Bank & Trust v. GaluskaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1993
  5. People Ex Rel. White v. UnderwoodIllinois Supreme Court · 1953

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API