Legal Opinion

Lincoln v. Mills

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided June 9, 1941No. 34624PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appellant's suit in ejectment was transferred to the Chancery Court, whereupon she filed her bill setting up that she was the owner of lot No. 7 of square 60, north of Main Street in the city of Columbus. This claim was sought to be based upon her purchase of this property at a foreclosure sale under a deed of trust executed by E.S. Moore in favor of C.L. Lincoln. The defendants are the heirs at law of Mrs. Alice H. Moore, who was the wife of E.S. Moore.

The salient facts as shown by the testimony and by stipulation of counsel are as follows: This property being part of Sixteenth Section…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. McClanahan's Administrator v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1918
  2. Potter v. AdamsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1894
  3. Niles v. DavisMississippi Supreme Court · 1883
  4. Virginia & West Virginia Coal, Co. v. CharlesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1918
  5. Street v. City of ColumbusMississippi Supreme Court · 1898

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. O'Neal Steel, Inc. v. MilletteMississippi Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Broome v. JacksonMississippi Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Broome v. JacksonMississippi Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Broome v. JacksonMississippi Supreme Court · 1942
  5. O'Neal Steel, Inc. v. Terrence John MilletteMississippi Supreme Court · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API