Legal Opinion
Turnbull v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided November 1, 2006No. 3D05-272PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Per curiam
Andre Turnbull (“Turnbull”), appeals his conviction and sentence for unlawful driving as a habitual offender. We reverse.
*276The pertinent facts are as follows: Two police officers stopped Turnbull, an African-American man, for driving with a broken headlight. Turnbull admitted that he was driving with a suspended license, but claimed it was out of necessity to rescue his stranded girlfriend. The officers reviewed Turnbull’s driving record and arrested him. The State charged Turnbull with driving as a habitual traffic offender.
At the beginning of voir dire, the first questions the State asked the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- State v. NeilSupreme Court of Florida · 1984
- Melbourne v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1996
- Whitby v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
- Frazier v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Glinton v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007
- People v. Flores CA4/2California Court of Appeal · 2020
- State Of Washington v. Jeffery Deon BrownCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
- State Of Washington, Res. v. Dwight David Benson, App.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2013