Legal Opinion

Ohio Casualty Insurance v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided February 21, 1967No. Gen. 66-81PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Seidenfeld

This appeal from a declaratory judgment involves a dispute between plaintiff insurance companies and the defendant insurance company as to which is responsible under their respective policies for defense and any judgment arising out of an injury suit filed by Carroll against Livesay, Jr.

The facts are not in dispute and only a legal question emerges. The appeal is taken from the judgment declaring that U.S.F. & G. is primarily liable and Ohio Casualty and West American liable for any excess.

Carroll was a salesman-employee of Parkway Motors. In the course of his employment he permitted Livesay,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Transport Insurance Co. v. Standard Oil Co. of TexasTexas Supreme Court · 1960
  2. General Accident Fire & Life Assurance Corp. v. BrownAppellate Court of Illinois · 1962

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Globe Indemnity Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Zenti v. Home Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1978
  3. Schomas v. Farmers Automobile Ass'nAppellate Court of Illinois · 1973
  4. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Globe Indemnity Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API