Legal Opinion

Patek v. Patek

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided November 24, 1931No. Gen. No. 35,094PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Keener

Complainant, Sara Patek, filed her bill for an accounting against Abraham H. Patek, Chicago Title & Trust Company, as trustee, W. J. Newman and Eichard Barry. The defendant, Abraham H. Patek, filed an amended cross-bill against the cross defendant, Sarah Patek. Its essential averments are that in January, 1919, he came to live with Sara Patek and their two brothers; that he was of considerable assistance to his sister by his advice and counsel and that they were in the habit of confidence and harmony of interest in their mutual affairs and she frequently consulted him about her business…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. National Surety Co. v. T. B. Townsend Brick & Contracting Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Phillips v. PhillipsIllinois Supreme Court · 1863
  3. Goacher v. BatesIllinois Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Grinton v. StrongIllinois Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Walker v. MatthewsIllinois Supreme Court · 1871

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Faith v. MartoccioAppellate Court of Illinois · 1974
  2. Richton v. FarinaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1973
  3. Bramson v. BramsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1955
  4. Lellos v. LellosAppellate Court of Illinois · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API