Legal Opinion

People v. Norton

New York Court of Chancery

Decided April 28, 1828PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The Chancellor:—In these cases, application is made for the appointment of a receiver of the rents and profits of certain lots in the city of New York, which, by inquest of office, have been found to have escheated to the people of this state.

The facts disclosed in the respective bills, together with *18the affidavits on which the motions are founded, show the propriety and necessity of the appointment; and the only difficulty in my mind has been in relation to want of notice to the defendant Norton. As a general rule, a receiver should not be appointed without notice to the opposite party; but…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Sandford v. SinclairNew York Court of Chancery · 1840

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Verplanck v. Mercantile InsuranceNew York Court of Chancery · 1831
  2. Loaiza v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Crowder v. MooneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1875
  4. Haugan v. NetlandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
  5. Kemp v. HardingNew York Supreme Court · 1849

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API