Legal Opinion

Heyward Bros. & Co. v. Phillips Buttoff M'fg. Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided July 1, 1892PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from Birmingham City Court. Tried before Hon. H. A. Sharpe. cited Cleveland v. State, 34 Ala. 258 ; Tellinghast v. Johnson; 5 Ala. 514; Carey v. Go-egg, 3 Stew. 433 ; Barher v. Ferrill, 57 Ala. 446 ; Brake on Attachment, § 453 ; Endlich on Statutes, §351. No brief on file.

1Opinion of the Court

HARALSON,

J. — This was an attachment suit before a justice of the peace, by Phillips Buttoff Manufacturing Co., plaintiffs, v. Blah’s Southern Furniture Company, defendant, a firm composed, as stated, of Herman Bich, in which suit the Bichmond & Danville Bailroad Co. was summoned to answer as garnishee. A trial was had on the 20th January, 1892, and a judgment rendered against the defendant for $99.50. On the same day the garnishee answered, admitting the possession of fifty-four bundles of chairs, consigned to Herman Bich, of the firm of Bich’s Southern Furniture Co. No suggestion of notice…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Henderson v. Ala. Gold Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1882
  2. McAdams v. Beard & HendersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1859

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Adams v. CreenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1893
  2. Blackman & Co. v. CollierAlabama Court of Appeals · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API