Legal Opinion
Silverman v. Perlbinder
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided July 31, 2003PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Edward Lehner, J.), entered March 12, 2002, which granted defendants’ motions and cross motions for summary judgment and dismissed the complaint, unanimously reversed, on the law, with costs, the motions and cross motions denied and the complaint reinstated.
It is well settled that a proponent of a motion for summary judgment must make a prima facie showing of entitlement to judgment as a matter of law, advancing sufficient evidence to demonstrate the absence of any material issues of fact (see Alvarez v Prospect Hosp., 68 NY2d 320, 324 [1986]; Zuckerman…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Zuckerman v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Alvarez v. Prospect HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Winegrad v. New York University Medical CenterNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
3Cited by10 opinions
- Quinones v. New England Motor Freight Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Dorsey v. Les Sans CulottesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Frenchman v. Queller, Fisher, Dienst, Serrins, Washor & Kool, LLPNew York Supreme Court · 2009
- Herbert Paul, CPA, P.C. v. 370 Lex, L.L.C.New York Supreme Court · 2005
- Figueroa v. GallagerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.