Legal Opinion · Dissent

Clinic for Women, Inc. v. Brizzi

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 23, 2005No. 49S05-0501-CV-31Published

1DissentBoehm, Justice

For the reasons given below, I respectfully dissent. I believe the Court of Appeals correctly held that the inalienable right to liberty enshrined in Article I, Section 1 of the Indiana Bill of Rights includes the right of a woman to choose for herself whether to terminate her pregnancy, at least where there is no viable fetus or her health is at issue. I also believe the plaintiffs have alleged facts which, if they can be established, show that the statute in question imposes a material burden on the exercise of that right. Accordingly, I *995agree with the Court of Appeals that the trial…

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
  2. Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  5. Troxel v. GranvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 2000

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API