Clinic for Women, Inc. v. Brizzi
Indiana Supreme Court
1DissentBoehm, Justice
For the reasons given below, I respectfully dissent. I believe the Court of Appeals correctly held that the inalienable right to liberty enshrined in Article I, Section 1 of the Indiana Bill of Rights includes the right of a woman to choose for herself whether to terminate her pregnancy, at least where there is no viable fetus or her health is at issue. I also believe the plaintiffs have alleged facts which, if they can be established, show that the statute in question imposes a material burden on the exercise of that right. Accordingly, I *995agree with the Court of Appeals that the trial…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Troxel v. GranvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.