Legal Opinion

In re Pinks

United States Bankruptcy Court, D. South Carolina

Decided January 22, 2015No. Case No. 12-00317-ddPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

David R. Duncan, Chief U.S. Bankruptcy Judge

This matter is before the Court on the motion of creditor M & T Bank Corporation (“M & T Bank”) to reopen the bankruptcy case pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 350(b), and the objection of Debtors Jerry and Kathleen Pinks (“Debtors”). The Court held a hearing on the motion on January 7, 2015. For the reasons set forth below, having carefully considered the applicable law, evidence submitted, and arguments of counsel, the Court sustains *116the objection of the Debtors and denies M & T Bank’s motion.

I. Facts and Procedural History

The facts in this case are…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Harold J. Hawkins and Eugenia B. Hawkins v. Landmark Finance Company, in Re Harold J. Hawkins and Eugenia B. Hawkins, DebtorsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1984
  2. In the Matter of Henri J. Bianucci and Barbara J. Bianucci, Debtors-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
  3. Reid v. RichardsonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1962
  4. K. Dale Wissman, Sheryll Wissman v. Pittsburgh National BankCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1991
  5. Redmond v. Fifth Third BankCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Environmental Wood Products, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Georgia · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API