Legal Opinion

Veeraswamy v. Stern

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 29, 2008PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In an action to recover a down payment made pursuant to a contract for the sale of real property, the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the *1128Supreme Court, Queens County (Agate, J.), entered December 13, 2007, which denied their motion for summary judgment.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

“The proponent of a summary judgment motion must make a prima facie showing of entitlement to judgment as a matter of law, tendering sufficient evidence to eliminate any material issues of fact from the case” (Winegrad v New York Univ. Med. Ctr., 64 NY2d 851, 853 [1985]). Here, the plaintiffs…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Winegrad v. New York University Medical CenterNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
  2. IBM Credit Financing Corp. v. Mazda Motor Manufacturing (USA) Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1998
  3. Morgan v. McCaffreyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Peng v. Willets Point Asphalt Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  2. Taylor v. CarboneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  3. Children of America (Cortlandt Manor), LLC v. Pike Plaza Associates, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  4. Children of America (Cortlandt Manor), LLC v. Pike Plaza Associates, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  5. Taylor v. CarboneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API