Legal Opinion · Dissent

Stoffel v. Commissioner of Public Safety

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided September 30, 1986No. CO-86-710Published

1DissentPopovich, Chief Judge

I respectfully dissent for the following reasons:

1. Minn.Stat. § 171.30, subd. 3 “is mandatory in that the Commissioner shall issue a limited Class A license for work-related purposes.” Sullivan v. Commissioner of Public Safety, 371 N.W.2d 569, 572 (Minn.Ct.App.1985) (emphasis in original).

2. The purpose of subdivision 3 is to allow drivers who possess a Class A or Class B license a limited license to continue to drive for employment purposes, when the violation which occurred was in a private passenger motor vehicle. I interpret subdivision 3 to allow a driver with a Class A license to drive…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Sullivan v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API