Smith v. Valdez

OPINION

Appellant Ralph Smith appeals from a judgment granting appellees a permanent injunction.

Appellant’s brief fails to comply with even the most rudimentary briefing rules. See TEX.R.APP.P. 74. The brief’s statement of the facts is not fair and condensed; it is not pertinent to any points of error; nor does it make reference to any pages in the record where support might be found. TEX.R.APP.P. 74(f).

The appellant does not present in his brief a discussion of facts or authorities relied upon to maintain his so-called points of error. Id.

Further, his supposed points of error are too general…