Legal Opinion
Perry Holloway v. United States
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided November 5, 1964No. 18017PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BAZELON, Chief Judge.
The only allegation of error in this appeal from a forgery conviction is that the trial court erred in denying the defense’s pre-trial motion for a mental examination to determine competence to stand trial. After appellant filed his brief in this court, the Government moved to remand for a judicial determination of appellant’s competency at the time of his trial over a year ago, that determination to be made after a mental examination.1 The Government argues that, if appellant is now found to have been competent when tried, he “was not prejudiced by denial of the motion…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Dusky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Gunther v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1954
- Milton R. Dusky v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1959
- Wear v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1954
- Perry v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1952
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Robert Vernon Bruce v. W. J. Estelle, Director, Texas Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
- United States v. Michael A. S. MakrisCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
- David L. Hansford v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1966
- United States ex rel. Bilyew v. FranzenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
- United States v. Michael A. S. MakrisCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.