Legal Opinion

Bayliss v. Williams

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1869PublishedCited by 5 opinions

EROM MEMPHIS. These causes were heard together, before Chancellor William M. Smith, at the - Term, 1867'; when there was a decree for the complainants, and an appeal by the defendants.

1Opinion of the CourtHeney G. Smith, J.

The complainants are the heirs of Abram Bayliss. They exhibit this bill against the defendant, Williams, to set aside a deed of conveyance of lands made by them to him; the equity alleged, is, that Williams stood in a relation of trust and confidence to them in respect of the lands, and obtained the deed from them by “undue influence.-” At the time the conveyance was made, a suit was pending between the complainants and creditors of their deceased father, whereby the creditors sought to subject the lands to the payment of the debts of the father. Upon the conveyance being made, Williams took…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Jackson, ex dem. Rounds v. M'ChesneyNew York Supreme Court · 1827
  2. Nolen v. Heirs of GwynSupreme Court of Alabama · 1849

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Iacometti v. FrassinelliCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1973
  2. Linda Sue Edwards v. Travelers Insurance of Hartford, Connecticut, P. v. Jackson, III v. Travelers Insurance of Hartford, Connecticut, P. v. Jackson, III v. Travelers Insurance of Hartford, ConnecticutCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1977
  3. Arnoult v. GriffinCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1972
  4. Edwards v. Travelers Insurance of HartfordCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1977
  5. Kathy Austin v. Jacob Wilds, Jr.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API