Legal Opinion

McKean v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided June 23, 1995No. Nos. 94-256T, 94-279T to 94-284T, 94-290T to 94-294T, 94-319T and 94-320TPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HODGES, Judge.

This case comes before the court on plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment and defendant’s cross-motion for partial summary judgment on Counts I and II of plaintiffs’ tax refund suit. The question before us is whether the portion of a Title VII cash back-pay award received by plaintiffs representing the value of lost health insurance benefits and lost travel passes is includible in gross income under § 61(a) of the Internal Revenue Code, as the government contends, or excludable from gross income, as plaintiffs contend. In addition, we are asked to decide whether…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Albemarle Paper Co. v. MoodySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Commissioner v. Glenshaw Glass Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
  3. United States v. GilmoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. United States v. BurkeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. Woodward v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1970

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hogan v. BD. OF POLICE COM'RS OF KAN. CITYMissouri Court of Appeals · 2011
  2. United States v. Amoskeag Bank Shares, Inc. (In Re Amoskeag Bank Shares, Inc.)District Court, D. New Hampshire · 1998
  3. In re Amoskeag Bank SharesDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API