Legal Opinion

Scott v. Dedham Water Co.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided June 20, 1916PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBraley, J.

The plaintiff owns property for which the defendant, a public service corporation, furnished water, but a dispute having arisen over the rates, he was notified that unless payment was made "of the amount claimed by the company the service would be discontinued. It is alleged, in the bill thereupon brought for permanent injunctive relief, that, if this is done, the plaintiff’s estate will be greatly damaged and the health of members of his family impaired. The allegations of the first paragraph of the bill, admitted by the answer, are that when the plaintiff purchased the premises the company…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Turner v. Revere Water Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1898
  2. Merrimack River Savings Bank v. City of LowellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1891
  3. Souther v. City of GloucesterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905
  4. Dickey v. Trustees of the Putnam Free SchoolMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Canney v. New England Telephone & Telegraph Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1967
  2. Fulghum v. Town of SelmaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  3. Williams v. SederMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
  4. Champlin v. JacksonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1945
  5. Waldron v. International Water Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1921

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API