Legal Opinion

People v. Smith

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided September 22, 2011PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Except as to the burglary conviction, the verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. Defendant, together with an accomplice, impersonated police officers in order to effect physical control over the victim. They compelled him to submit to a patdown, and in the process they took property from his person. This satisfied the force element of second-degree robbery (see People v Lomba, 183 AD2d 672 [1992], lv denied 80 NY2d 906 [1992]; People v Lazarcheck, 176 AD2d 691, 692 [1991], lv denied 79 NY2d 1003 [1992]). The theft was not merely a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. MaisonetAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  2. People v. LombaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. People v. SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 2014
  2. People v. SpeaksAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
  3. People v. NealonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  4. People v. WilliamsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2023
  5. People v. WilliamsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2023

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API