Aaron Stanz, individually and derivatively on behalf of Jet Genuis Holdings, Inc. v. Jordan Brown, et al.
District Court, S.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 AARON STANZ, individually and Case No.: 22-cv-01164-GPC-JLB derivatively on behalf of Jet Genuis 12 Holdings, Inc., ORDER AWARDING 13 ATTORNEY’S FEES Plaintiff, 14 v. 15 JORDAN BROWN, et al., [ECF Nos. 236, 238] 16 Defendants. 17 18 AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIM. 19 20 Before the Court is a Declaration of Attorney Matt Blum in support of Reasonable 21 Attorney’s Fees Incurred (“Declaration”). (ECF No. 238.) The Declaration was filed in 22 response to the Court’s January 29, 2026, Order Granting Plaintiff’s Request…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Fox v. ViceSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Camacho v. Bridgeport Financial, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- In Re Bluetooth Headset Products LiabilityCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.