Legal Opinion

Mariam v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided April 28, 1978No. 11545PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

FERREN, Associate Judge:

On September 6, 1976, at the conclusion of a nonjury trial, the court found appellant guilty of transmitting a “threat to injure the person of” complainant, Ghodratollah Mohaghegh, with the intent to extort money. D.C.Code 1973, § 22-2306(2). On October 27, 1976, the court suspended “imposition of sentence” and placed appellant on three-years’ probation. Appellant has asserted two errors: (1) the indictment’s omission of an allegedly essential element of the crime, namely that the threat to injure complainant must have been communicated to “another person” who is not…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Paul John Carbo, Frank Palermo, Joseph Sica, Louis Tom Dragna, and Truman K. Gibson, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
  2. Rathbun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  3. United States v. YoungDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1977
  4. United States v. Wallace Howard SmithCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
  5. Harry Oliver Seeber v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People v. SorianoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API