Legal Opinion

Collum v. Lucksinger

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided January 30, 1900Published

Appeal from the Montgomery Circuit Court. — Hon. Elliot M. Hughes, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtBland, P. J.

On August 17, Í896, Fahrner as principal and Lueksinger as surety, made and delivered to Collum their promissory note for $500 due one year after date, with interest. On the maturity of the note Lueksinger gave Collum notice to sue, as he ■ might do under the provision of section 8343, Revised Statutes 1889. Within thirty days after service of notice Collum brought suit by attachment against both Fahrner and Lueksinger, returnable to. the next term of court to be thereafter held at Montgomery City. None of Fahrner’s property was attached, and no effort, so far as the record shows, was made to…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Sisk v. RosenbergerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1884

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API