Legal Opinion

Kesterson v. Juhl

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 9, 1998No. 960201042; CA A97376PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLandau, P. J.

Plaintiffs appeal a summary judgment dismissing their claims for breach of contract and declaratory judgment. The principal issue concerns the validity of a “loan fee” of $102,000 required in the event of untimely repayment of a $145,000 loan. Plaintiffs contend that the fee is an unenforceable liquidated damages provision. Defendant contends that it is a valid, if costly, fee for additional time to pay off the loan. The trial court held that the provision was enforceable as a matter of law. We disagree and reverse and remand.

The relevant facts are not in dispute. On January 24, 1995, the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Jones v. General Motors Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Illingworth v. BushongOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  3. DiTommaso Realty, Inc. v. Moak Motorcycles, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1990

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Allstream Business US, LLC v. Carrier Network Solutions, LLCDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2021
  2. Breslau v. CampbellDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2024
  3. LRY, LLC v. Lake CountyDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2021
  4. Springer Construction LLCUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Oregon · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API