Legal Opinion

Thomas v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided June 25, 1997No. 96-0565Published

1Opinion of the Court

KLEIN, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of sale of cocaine and possession with intent to sell, and argues that he is entitled to a new trial under Coney v. State, 653 So.2d 1009 (Fla.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 116 S.Ct. 315, 133 L.Ed.2d 218 (1995). We affirm his convictions, but reverse his habitual offender sentence.

*1289In Coney, our supreme court construed Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.180(a)(4) to mean that a defendant has a “right to be physically present at the immediate site where pretrial juror challenges are exercised.” Id. at 1013. In the present case the defendant was not at the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Coney v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1995
  2. Mejia v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
  3. Garcia v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API