Meldrum v. Novotny
South Dakota Supreme Court
1ConcurrenceAmundson, Justice
[¶ 63.] Because I believe the best interest of the child should always be paramount, I would reverse and remand for a determination of this issue.8
[¶ 64.] A child’s welfare should be of utmost importance, even when evaluating a custody battle between a parent and non-parent. There is a plethora of cases in this state placing “the best interest of the child” on a pedestal above all other considerations in custody battles. See, e.g., In re W.G., 1999 SD 85, ¶ 22, 597 N.W.2d 430, 434 (stating “[t]he best interest of the children must always prevail.”); Zepeda v. Zepeda, 2001 SD 101, ¶ 13, 632…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Zepeda v. ZepedaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
- Matter of Guardianship of SedelmeierSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
- Doe v. DoeNew York Supreme Court · 1977
- Driver v. L.K.T.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1996
- Fisher v. FisherNevada Supreme Court · 1983
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.