Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Meldrum v. Novotny

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided January 30, 2002No. NonePublished

1ConcurrenceAmundson, Justice

[¶ 63.] Because I believe the best interest of the child should always be paramount, I would reverse and remand for a determination of this issue.8

[¶ 64.] A child’s welfare should be of utmost importance, even when evaluating a custody battle between a parent and non-parent. There is a plethora of cases in this state placing “the best interest of the child” on a pedestal above all other considerations in custody battles. See, e.g., In re W.G., 1999 SD 85, ¶ 22, 597 N.W.2d 430, 434 (stating “[t]he best interest of the children must always prevail.”); Zepeda v. Zepeda, 2001 SD 101, ¶ 13, 632…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Zepeda v. ZepedaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Matter of Guardianship of SedelmeierSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Doe v. DoeNew York Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Driver v. L.K.T.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1996
  5. Fisher v. FisherNevada Supreme Court · 1983

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API