People v. Tosca
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed. The trial court did not abuse its discretion in admitting the police officers’ testimony concerning an unidentified cab driver’s report of a recent encounter with the armed defendant. The testimony was admitted not for its truth, but to provide background information as to how and why the police pursued and confronted defendant (see People v Till, 87 NY2d 835, 837). Further, the trial court twice explicitly instructed the jury on the limited use it could make of the testimony and that the testimony was not…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- People v. AshwalNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- People v. TillNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
3Cited by164 opinions
- People v. MorrisNew York Court of Appeals · 2013
- People v. ResekNew York Court of Appeals · 2004
- People v. CrawfordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- People v. BryanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- People v. NewlandAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
159 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.