Legal Opinion
United States v. McDonald
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided September 8, 2016No. 15-2214Unpublished
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY *
Harris L Hartz, Circuit Judge
Defendant Cassidine McDonald, a federal prisoner proceeding pro se, moved for relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 more than one year after his conviction became final. The United States District Court for the District of New Mexico dismissed his motion as time-barred under § 2255(f). Defendant now requests a certificate of ap-pealability (COA) from this court to appeal the dismissal. 1 See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B). We deny his request and dismiss the appeal.
Defendant pleaded guilty to three counts of aggravated sexual abuse…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Field v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- La Abra Silver Mining Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- Edwards v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Mester Manufacturing Company v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.