Legal Opinion
426 Bloomfield Avenue Corp. v. City of Newark
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided November 2, 1995No. Civ. A. 95-1974 (MTB)PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BARRY, District Judge.
This matter has come before the court on plaintiffs’ motion and defendant’s cross-motion for summary judgment pursuant to Fed. R.Civ.P. 56(c). For the reasons set forth below, plaintiffs’ motion will be denied and defendant’s cross-motion will be granted as to Count One of plaintiffs’ complaint. Also for the reasons set forth below, this court will abstain from ruling with respect to the remainder of plaintiffs’ claims, and those claims will be dismissed.
I. STATEMENT OF THE CASE
As a municipal corporation, the City of Newark (“the City”) is authorized by the State…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Ingersoll-Rand Co. v. McClendonSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- King v. St. Vincent's HospitalSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Green v. Bock Laundry MacHine Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Cardinal Towing & Auto Repair, Inc. v. City of BedfordCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
- R. Mayer of Atlanta, Inc. v. City of AtlantaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1998
- Harris County Wrecker Owners for Equal Opportunity v. City of HoustonDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1996
- Greyhound Lines, Inc. v. City of New Orleans Ex Rel. Department of Public UtilitiesDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1998
- Brumfield Towing Service, Inc. v. City of Baton RougeDistrict Court, M.D. Louisiana · 1996
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.