Legal Opinion

Wolfe v. Goulard

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 1859PublishedCited by 21 opinions

Motion by defendant to dissolve injunction.

1Opinion of the Court

Ingraham, Justice.

The plaintiff, in his complaint, avers that he has 'for a long time past been, and now is, the manufacturer and seller of a certain kind of gin, known as. “ Schiedam Schnapps,” of the composition of which he is the original inventor, different from any other kind of gin, and superior to any other; that he first invented and adopted the term “ Schiedam Schnapps,” as a label, trade-mark or sign of the gin so sold by him, which previously was wholly unused, and never before known in the market as any designation for gin of any kind; that he has used the term “ Schiedam…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Brooklyn White Lead Co. v. MasuryNew York Supreme Court · 1857
  2. People ex rel. Perry v. ThompsonNew York Supreme Court · 1857
  3. Furman v. WalterNew York Supreme Court · 1856

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Selchow v. . BakerNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
  2. Vidal v. ElsterSupreme Court of the United States · 2024
  3. Newman v. AlvordNew York Supreme Court · 1867
  4. O'Rourke v. Central City Soap Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Michigan · 1885
  5. Gillott v. EsterbrookNew York Supreme Court · 1867

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API