Wolfe v. Goulard
New York Supreme Court
Motion by defendant to dissolve injunction.
1Opinion of the Court
Ingraham, Justice.
The plaintiff, in his complaint, avers that he has 'for a long time past been, and now is, the manufacturer and seller of a certain kind of gin, known as. “ Schiedam Schnapps,” of the composition of which he is the original inventor, different from any other kind of gin, and superior to any other; that he first invented and adopted the term “ Schiedam Schnapps,” as a label, trade-mark or sign of the gin so sold by him, which previously was wholly unused, and never before known in the market as any designation for gin of any kind; that he has used the term “ Schiedam…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Brooklyn White Lead Co. v. MasuryNew York Supreme Court · 1857
- People ex rel. Perry v. ThompsonNew York Supreme Court · 1857
- Furman v. WalterNew York Supreme Court · 1856
3Cited by21 opinions
- Selchow v. . BakerNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
- Vidal v. ElsterSupreme Court of the United States · 2024
- Newman v. AlvordNew York Supreme Court · 1867
- O'Rourke v. Central City Soap Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Michigan · 1885
- Gillott v. EsterbrookNew York Supreme Court · 1867
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.