Legal Opinion
La Rose v. Young
District Court, N.D. California
Decided March 23, 1956No. Civ. No. 35068PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OLIVER J. CARTER, District Judge.
Russell Louis LaRose has petitioned this Court for a writ of habeas corpus, contending that he is being unlawfully restrained by the Commanding General of the Sixth Army. Respondent moves to dismiss.
In 1950 petitioner registered for the draft, and was eventually classified 1-A-O, as a conscientious objector available for noncombatant military service only. In 1953 he was ordered to report for induction, and was inducted into the Army as a conscientious objector available for noncombatant military service only.
Petitioner alleges that his first assignment in the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- In Re GrimleySupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Hiatt v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Nelson v. PeckhamCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1954
- Levin v. GillespieDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1954
- Lieutenant General W. G. Wyman, Commanding Officer of the Sixth Army, Presidio of San Francisco, California v. Russell Louis La RoseCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1955
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Erickson v. Commanding GeneralDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1956
- United States v. HansenDistrict Court, D. Montana · 1958