Legal Opinion

Fieldiing v. Highsmith

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided April 30, 1943PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SEBRING, J.:

On August 17, 1942, the appellee, Dan Highsmith, instituted a habeas corpus proceeding against appellants to recover custody of his minor daughter, Johnnie Lou. The petition attacks the validity of a proceeding brought in the Circuit Court of Hillsborough County by Libby Rush Fielding —then Libby Rush — for the adoption of his minor daughter, on the ground that the order of adoption was entered without notice to him. On final hearing in the habeas corpus proceeding the trial court found that the father was a fit and proper person and awarded him the custody of the child. There was…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In re KnottTennessee Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Marshall v. ReamsSupreme Court of Florida · 1893
  3. In Re: Mary Elizabeth WhetstoneSupreme Court of Florida · 1939
  4. Bourn v. Hinsey, Et Ux.Supreme Court of Florida · 1937

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Halstead Ex Rel. Lee v. HalsteadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1966
  2. State Ex Rel. Lewis v. Lutheran Social Services of Wisconsin & Upper MichiganWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Carpenter v. ForsheeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961
  4. Wiggins v. RollsSupreme Court of Florida · 1958
  5. Eddy v. StaufferSupreme Court of Florida · 1948

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API