Legal Opinion

Reagan v. Planning Board

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided December 2, 1994No. 93-P-1401PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The defendant Braintree Property Associates (hereafter “shopping center” or “center”) submitted to the planning board, for an “approval-not-required” (ANR) endorsement, a perimeter plan for a proposed single 106-acre lot comprised of the eighty-five acre parcel on which South Shore Plaza, a major shopping center, is situated, and a nonadjacent twenty-one acre parcel to which the center is connected by a subdivision roadway. An effect, the developers of the shopping center apparently hope, will be to convert the center’s zoning status from nonconforming to conforming, thus enabling a planned…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Smalley v. Planning Board of HarwichMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1980
  2. Shea v. Board of AppealsMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1993
  3. Corrigan v. Board of AppealsMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1993

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cumberland Farms, Inc. v. Planning BoardMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2005
  2. Nextsun Energy LLC v. FernandesMassachusetts Land Court · 2021
  3. Town of Randolph v. Town of StoughtonMassachusetts Superior Court · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API