Legal Opinion

Whorley v. Patton-Kjose Company, Inc.

Montana Supreme Court

Decided October 21, 1931No. 6,798PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Matthews

Plaintiff has appealed from a judgment in favor of defendant entered in an action for specific performance and accounting.

The record discloses the following facts: In 1929 the defend ant corporation was engaged in the grain business with offices at Great Falls, Spokane and Minneapolis; plaintiff, one of its buyers, had had considerable experience in operating elevators. In May defendant acquired an elevator at Chester, and in July agreed to sell it to plaintiff on terms; before the contract was drawn, J. E. Patton, president, was called to Minneapolis and thereupon wrote Whorley the terms of…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Board of Trade of Chicago v. Christie Grain & Stock Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1905
  2. Escallier v. Great Northern Ry. Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Ferguson v. StandleyMontana Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Leach & Co. v. PeirsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  5. United States v. New York Coffee & Sugar Exchange, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hamilton v. AbadjianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Spurgeon v. Imperial Elevator Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1935
  3. H. Earl Clack Co. v. OltesvigMontana Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Anderson v. CraigMontana Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Gilbert v. Bostona Mines Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API