Whorley v. Patton-Kjose Company, Inc.
Montana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Matthews
Plaintiff has appealed from a judgment in favor of defendant entered in an action for specific performance and accounting.
The record discloses the following facts: In 1929 the defend ant corporation was engaged in the grain business with offices at Great Falls, Spokane and Minneapolis; plaintiff, one of its buyers, had had considerable experience in operating elevators. In May defendant acquired an elevator at Chester, and in July agreed to sell it to plaintiff on terms; before the contract was drawn, J. E. Patton, president, was called to Minneapolis and thereupon wrote Whorley the terms of…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Board of Trade of Chicago v. Christie Grain & Stock Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Escallier v. Great Northern Ry. Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1912
- Ferguson v. StandleyMontana Supreme Court · 1931
- Leach & Co. v. PeirsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- United States v. New York Coffee & Sugar Exchange, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Hamilton v. AbadjianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Spurgeon v. Imperial Elevator Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1935
- H. Earl Clack Co. v. OltesvigMontana Supreme Court · 1937
- Anderson v. CraigMontana Supreme Court · 1940
- Gilbert v. Bostona Mines Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1948