Legal Opinion

Fendt v. Tarabusi

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 29, 1929No. Docket No. 96, Calendar No. 34,090PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcDonald, J.

This is a summary proceeding to recover possession of a farm located in the county of Oakland, Michigan. To review a judgment in the circuit court in favor of the plaintiffs, the defendant has brought error.

The sole question involved is whether Ludovic Tarabusi is a necessary party defendant. Ludovic is a brother of the defendant, Anthony.. The claim is that he furnished a portion of the property that was used as a down payment and is entitled to a third of the vendee’s interest in the contract. The question was tried out by the court without a jury. The judge filed an opinion in which he…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Atlas v. Gunsberg Packing Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Bailey v. JacksonMichigan Supreme Court · 1928

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Postal Telegraph Cable Co. v. CarpenterMichigan Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Fendt v. TarabusiMichigan Supreme Court · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API