Legal Opinion

Berrier v. Carefusion 203, Inc.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided January 7, 2014No. COA13-251PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRYANT, Judge.

Where Quality Medical does not challenge the applicability of our long-arm statute in the exercise of personal jurisdiction and competent evidence supports the trial court’s findings of fact and conclusion of law that Quality Medical maintained minimum contacts with North Carolina such that the exercise of personal jurisdiction does not offend the notion of due process, we affirm the order of the trial court.

On 29 September 2011 and later on 3 April 2012, plaintiff Kristin Berrier, both individually and in her capacity as administrator of the Estate of Jacob Alexander Berrier,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Tom Togs, Inc. v. Ben Elias Industries Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  3. Banc of America Securities LLC v. Evergreen International Aviation, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
  4. Bruggeman v. Meditrust Acquisition Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
  5. Skinner v. Preferred CreditSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2006

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hundley v. AutoMoneyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2022
  2. Hundley v. AutoMoneyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2022
  3. K2 Asia Ventures v. TrotaCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2014
  4. Leake v. AutoMoneyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2022
  5. Leake v. AutoMoneyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API